The Dangers of a Conviction Based on the Testimony of One Person w/Eric Tindal

Today, Hunter is joined by Eric Tindal, a criminal defense attorney in Iowa. Today’s discussion focuses on the question, how much evidence does it take to convict someone. Specifically, Hunter and Eric discussed how a single uncorroborated testimony can be sufficient to secure a conviction. This episode kicks off a miniseries comparing what evidence is perfectly fine for prosecutors to rely on and what evidence is barred from even being heard when the defense wants to use it.

 

 

Guests:

Eric Tindal, Criminal Defense Attorney, Iowa

 

 

Resources:

Email Eric

eric@keeganlegal.com

Contact Hunter Parnell:                                            

Publicdefenseless@gmail.com 

Instagram

@PublicDefenselessPodcast

Twitter                                                                

@PDefenselessPod

www.publicdefenseless.com 

Subscribe to the Patron

www.patreon.com/PublicDefenselessPodcast

 Donate on PayPal

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=5KW7WMJWEXTAJ

Donate on Stripe

https://donate.stripe.com/7sI01tb2v3dwaM8cMN

 *As a reminder, any statements made on the show do not reflect the views or policies of the Colorado Office of the State Public Defender*

Previous
Previous

The Fight to Free a Man Convicted Because of One Cop's Perjury w/Jason Gain

Next
Next

The Former Bronx Defender Campaigning to Bring Holistic Defense to Florida's 9th Judicial Circuit w/Lenora Easter